Scientists Reveal 280-Million-Year-Old Fossil is a Forgery

By: Ben Campbell | Published: Aug 31, 2024

Scientists have conducted a new study on a 280-million-year-old fossil of a well-preserved reptile, revealing that it is likely a forgery.

The fossilized remains of the ancient reptile were discovered less than a century ago, complete with soft tissue, which was considered an extremely rare find during the era. Now, researchers propose the specimen may be nothing more than black paint on bones.

The Emergence of Reptiles

Reptiles first emerged on Earth during the Permian and Carboniferous era, beginning around 320 million years ago.

Advertisement
A photograph of a blue-crested Bangkok lizard

Source: Wikimedia

To gain a deeper understanding of ancient reptiles, researchers have meticulously studied thousands of fossils. Despite their work, the diversity of the earliest members of this species is a puzzle scientists are still attempting to solve.

The Hunt for Fossils With Soft Tissue

While the fossilized remains of reptiles can shed considerable insight into the species’ history, what’s even better is the remains of soft tissue, which posses vital biological information such as DNA. Unfortunately, this is extremely rare.

Advertisement
A photograph of two reptile fossils encased in stone

Source: Wikimedia

Over the years, examples of fossils with soft tissue have been reported. One of the most famous was unearthed in the Italian Alps in 1931.

The Discovery of the Specimen in the Alps

The specimen discovered in the Alps was given the scientific name Tridentinosaurus antiques. It was a small lizard-like animal with a dark outline that researchers of the era proposed was preserved soft tissue. Researchers theorized the fossil was around 280 million years old.

Advertisement
A photograph of the Italian Alps during winter

Source: Wikimedia

Despite appearing in several academic articles over the past century, no scientist ever studied the fossil in detail. As the years went on, several researchers began questioning the nature of the reptile as it proved difficult to match it with a similar species.

Researchers Conduct Study on Ancient Italian Fossil

At the beginning of the year, a team of researchers finally conducted an in-depth analysis of the fossil housed at the University of Padua’s Museum of Nature and Humankind in Italy. What they found was genuinely shocking.

Advertisement
A photograph of two scientists working in their laboratory

Source: Freepik

The dark color of the fossil, previously theorized to be soft tissue, was nothing more than black paint covering a small number of bones and a partially carved rock.

Study’s Lead Author Speaks on the Italian Forgery

According to the lead author of the new study, Dr. Valentina Rossi, “The body outline of this fossil specimen has the same color of genuine fossilized soft tissues of plants and also animals.”

Advertisement
A photograph of several reporters on the street

Source: Wikimedia

She added, “So, without the use of diagnostic techniques, it was impossible to identify the dark-colored material properly.”

Advertisement

20th Century Forgery

Despite the initial theory that the fossil might eventually provide researchers with valuable insight into the evolution of reptiles, the researchers explained that it was nothing more than a 20th-century forgery.

Advertisement
A photograph of several pieces of cardboard spelling out fake

Source: Freepik

“The fossil was believed to be unique because there were no other examples from the same geographical area and geological period of that preservation in a fossil vertebrate at the time,” Rossi said.

Advertisement

Early Researchers Fail to Identify the Fossil as a Fake

There were several reasons why the scientists who had previously examined the fossil failed to recognize it as a fake. One was the black color of the tissue, which was eerily similar to fossil plants found in similar rocks.

Advertisement
A photograph of two scientists checking test results in their lab

Source: Freepik

However, there are also certain oddities that may have been overlooked including the lack of visible bones including those that make up the skull, explained Rossi.

Advertisement

Researchers Compared the Fossil to Mummified Dinosaurs

According to Rossi, during the initial examination of the fossil in the 20th century, researchers assumed the bones were likely hidden deep beneath the layer of skin; thus, they were not visible.

Advertisement
A photograph of a mummified dinosaur

Source: Wikimedia

She added, “There are few examples of dinosaur mummies, where pretty much like human mummies, the bones are still wrapped inside the skin which is preserved in 3D.”

Advertisement

Researchers Began Analyzing the Fossils in 2021

Rossi and her colleagues began their initial study three years ago by examining the Italian fossil using ultraviolet photographs, revealing that the specimen was coated in an unknown thick substance.

Advertisement
A photograph of the fossil under ultraviolet light

Source: Valentina Rossi

“Coating fossils with varnish is an ancient method of preservation because, in the past, there were no other suitable methods to protect fossils from natural decay,” said study co-author Mariagabriella Fornasiero, curator of paleontology at the Museum of Nature and Humankind, in a statement.

Advertisement

The Fossil Was Covered in a Pigment Made From Charred Animal Bones

In response, the team of scientists decided to use a powerful microscope to examine the example. What they discovered was that the fossil was painted with “animal charcoal.” This pigment was popular over a century ago and was made using the charred remains of animal bones.

Advertisement
A photograph of charcoal burning in a fire

Source: Wikimedia

“The answer to all our questions was right in front of us; we had to study this fossil specimen in detail to reveal its secrets — even those that perhaps we did not want to know,” Rossi said.

Advertisement

Not the Oldest Mummy in the World

While the researchers were slightly upset with the nature of their results, they admit it makes sense why the fossil baffled scientists for nearly a century.

Advertisement
A photograph of a mummified dinosaur

Source: Wikimedia

Study co-author Evelyn Kustatscher, curator of paleontology at the South Tyrol Nature Museum in Bolzano, explains their research suggests that the Italian fossil “is not the oldest mummy in the world.”

Advertisement