These unique features quickly attracted global attention, prompting extensive scientific examination. The discovery sparked debates about their origins, with some speculating extraterrestrial connections.

However, further investigation revealed these beings were genuine biological entities. This shifted the focus from skepticism to scientific curiosity and validation.

They classified the specimens as “humanoid,” noting their similarities to humans but highlighting significant anatomical differences, such as their elongated skulls and tri-digital limbs.

This significant cranial volume increase accompanied by elongated skulls suggests these beings had unique evolutionary traits, distinct from known human ancestors.

Unlike humans, these beings had only three fingers and toes, a trait that has fueled further speculation about their origins and adaptations.

This absence of eyes is unusual and raises questions about their sensory capabilities and how they navigated their environment.

This ancient timeline places them in a significant historical context, providing a bit of insight into their era.

Dental examinations revealed severe dental abrasion and loss of teeth, indicating they may have had a challenging diet or lifestyle.

These structural variations further emphasize the distinctiveness of these beings compared to humans.

The classification as “humanoid” provides a basis for understanding their place in the evolutionary timeline, albeit still shrouded in mystery.

It suggests a possible link between these beings and the ancient civilizations that once thrived in the area.

The scientific community remains engaged in understanding their origins, adaptations, and implications for our knowledge of ancient life.

These nonhuman beings made a significant archaeological discovery during a public hearing in the Green Room of the Chamber of Deputies Congress of Mexico.

“According to UNAM [the Autonomous University of Mexico], who performed the carbon-14 analysis, these beings are about 1,000 years old. Maussan added, “They did not recover them in ships that crashed, but buried them in diatomaceous earth, a fossilized algae that is 17 million years old and was abundant at that time.”

“If I was the Mexican government, if I would make a recommendation to the Mexican government — that’s not our charge here, we’re doing this for NASA — my recommendation [would be]: If you have something strange, make samples available to the world scientific community and we’ll see what’s there,” Spergel said (via Space).

Important organizations like the World Committee on Mummy Studies rejected the authenticity of the mummies, describing the discovery as a fraud and calling it “an irresponsible organized campaign of misinformation,” (via Wired).

“They’re not extraterrestrials. They’re dolls made from animal bones from this planet joined together with modern synthetic glue,” said Flavio Estrada, an archeologist with Peru’s Institute for Legal Medicine and Forensic Sciences (via Reuters).

“Physical anthropologist Guido Lombardi, who has studied mummies in Peru, told the newspaper El Comercio that researchers who have worked with pre-Columbian mummies, especially from the Nazca area, clearly understand that the large mummies are pre-Columbian human beings modified for commercial purposes, and the supposed ‘small mummies’ are assembled structures.”

“And, above all else, it is a matter that is beyond the scope of Congress.” After the hearing, Ryan Graves, the retired US Navy pilot lieutenant who was among the attendees, expressed his disappointment and described the events as “a huge step backwards” and an “unsubstantiated stunt.”

After his visit, the Institute of Astronomy at UNAM issued a statement that claims “there is no observational or experimental report that provides evidence of the existence of life beyond Earth.”

He continues: “No one denies that there could be life on other planets. I am concerned about this waste of attention in the public discussion and also about the possible waste of resources.”

“As this is a commercial agreement, these results are confidential and no member of the LEMA can disseminate them,” the Institute of Physics said. “LEMA rejects any subsequent use, interpretation, or misrepresentation of the results it issues. In the case of the June 2017 analysis, any information that implies the participation of LEMA in any activity other than carbon 14 dating is invalid.”

Trejo Delarbre said, “The spectacle aligns with the anti-scientific attitude of the current Mexican government, casting a very bad light on the seriousness and commitment to science that the Mexican Congress should uphold.”

Some researchers are calling for the Mexican government to speak up and take action regarding the alien debacle, but no one has spoken about the facts surrounding the Nazca mummies.